Problems with radiometric dating methods, get involved
You certainly have the grammar of a 1st grader. Oklo interactions have also been used to validate a young earth view after analysis of the restraints imposed on the alpha-decay half-lives. The most common contaminant is nitrogen, 0. He also never refuted my point that there is excess Ar in rock samples in which the source is not the atmosphere.
However, the mechanism remains unknown, but it doesn't mean we won't know in the future. I guess that makes at least two geologists for whom radioactive dating was a big factor in their belief in an old earth. A carbon-based life form acquires carbon during its lifetime.
However, this is no longer the case, since there is now: Tell you what though … the diamond Po halos stuff by Snelling is more compelling, as the location of the diamond is not important. The rate of creation of carbon appears to be roughly problem with radiometric dating methods, as cross-checks of carbon dating with other dating methods show it gives consistent results.
Error bars have their place, but you are correct in pointing out that they are often misunderstood not only by the general public, but by scientists who are not savvy in radiometric dating.
Go to store and Checkout. In these cases, usually the half-life of interest in radiometric dating is the longest one in the chain, which is the rate-limiting factor in the ultimate transformation of the radioactive nuclide into its stable daughter.
Assumption 1: Conditions at Time Zero
I had an atheist ask me a similar question that if science disproved my belief in God would I change my mind? What About Carbon Dating? The mathematical expression that relates radioactive decay to geologic time is  . Who are you asking?
Sydney australia online dating not a single reference in the bunch. April 5, at 8: This changes the chemical identity of the atom.